Wedding Breeze

Now you are planning your wedding it is important to think about your wedding video.  Doing all of it yourself may be a lot cheaper and although the technology is awesome when it comes to equipment as explained below, it is always better to get a pro to do the work if you want something really completely unique to keep as a memento. 

All professional wedding video Sydney based firms use state of the art equipment, the single thing that sets them apart is the standard of work that they do, and this usually is reflected by their qualifications and experience.  Your wedding video is going to be something that you will cherish over time so it is important that the person doing the shooting has some good testimonials from prior clients. 

Wedding plans take time and so there is no real need to jump into getting a wedding videographer Sydney based company, take some time and make sure that they are going to provide you with a brilliant production as a cherished souvenir.  If you decide that you are going to do the honeymoon and wedding video yourself, you may think about using the Canon EOS 5D as it is a great camera for both videos and photographs. 

Given the amazing qualities that the Canon EOS 5D Mark II has, offering a full 21.1 megapixel and an HD movie capacity ; one has to ask the question, if this is the point at which photographers and videographers will be doing the same job.  Considering it, having only 1 equipment for two purposes should be the ‘it’ gadget.  Considering that you do not have to carry heavy loads of cameras, stands and lenses, having just one little camera should do the job.  But is it really up to it?  Are we actually into it? 

There is a fascinating convergence taking place though that’s being driven by the hardware makers.  Increasingly video capture is being found in everything from mobile phones and PDAs to dig cams.  Also, the cost of near-broadcast quality video gear has dropped to the point that cameras and modifying systems that were the vision of creative film makers simply a short while back are now reachable of almost everybody. 

Taking an effective photograph means telling a story in a single image.  Through choice of subject, composition, focus, cropping and so on, the photographer selects those things that he wants to convey the meaning intended, or not.  This is a demanding art as well as craft.  With film or video, motion pictures as they once were universally called, there’s the added component of multiple viewpoints achieved through modifying, as well as sound.  A mood can be created.  A complex story can be told.  The spectator’s perceptions and emotions can be manipulated to realize the creator’s informational or emotional ends.  But this is unusual, at least to the quality standard that we have set.  Most similar productions need 2, or three, or more folks with specialised talents to do the same thing. 

Nevertheless, even those of us with lesser experience and skills can still find pleasure in producing short videos and still photographs that can be creatively satisfying, and also even achieve wider recognition.  The point is that for some people video production could be a extraordinarily satisfying accessory to still photography, if not an actual alternative.  And, with the new generation of high definition equipment that has just become available this year at grounded prices, the visible quality of what can be produced is nothing short of extraordinary. 

So, will this be the medium of the future?  What will this be called?  What will you call the person that is both photographer and a videographer?  There is just so much difference that both mediums are arguing with one another which one is best.  Merging both will be tough as it is confusing in a way that in an artist’s viewpoint, a picture says more than a thousand words silently than a video that announces everything in motion and in words. 

If I’m going to have my opinion, using only 1 piece of equipment for photography and videography should be best kept for the enthusiasts and beginners alike.  Professionals are keener on conventions ; they deserve to be left with what they are trained to do.  A photographer should stick to his SLR, and a videographer stick with his video camera.  In ing this though, the professional wedding videographer is drawn to the Canon 5D SLR only for its ability to supply fantastic video pictures, usually only seen in 100k and video cameras.  The sole downside is, the SLR is primarily built for taking photos and not much thought is given to the ergonomics and functionality for videos.  ( Perhaps with its recognition among film makers this may soon change ).  With the comparisons of differences and likenesses, it is concluded that in this time, it is not sufficient for both parties to merge as a one job outline.  Perhaps two more years perhaps.